Simulating trends in reaction path geometry as a function of external fields. A generalized electronic diabatic model for two‐dimensional energy surfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We introduce a protocol to represent quantum states as a linear superposition of model electronic diabatic basis states coupled in an external (static) electric field. By considering an entire family of these models, we uncover trends in reaction‐path geometry and the topology of potential‐energy surfaces, including all those that can be realized in a two‐dimensional configurational space. Our approach can be used as a tool to model the key parameters (e.g., diabatic basis states, external field intensity) that yield desired geometrical characteristics in an actual potential energy surface. In this work, external agents such as laser fields, or a group of neighboring charges, are regarded as essential requirements to prompt, or trigger, the occurrence of a chemical process. In these cases, reaction path geometry can be modulated externally so as to yield processes that would appear to occur far from gas‐phase geometries. This phenomenology is intrinsically nonadiabatic. Our present approach accounts for the possibility of such features, i.e., the occurrence of quantum states whose electronic structures resemble products, while at geometries that are more similar to those of reactants. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2008
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".