Bryophyte community structure in a boreal poor fen II: interspecific competition among five mosses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A possible competitive hierarchy among five boreal bryophytes (Sphagnum angustifolium, Sphagnum fuscum, Sphagnum magellanicum, Ptilium crista-castrensis, and Pleurozium schreberi) was examined in a 2-year transplant experiment conducted in two habitats of a poor fen in northern Alberta, Canada, using a sixth moss (Aulacomnium palustre) as a phytometer. Change in relative growth rate in length and weight of A. palustre, measured as competitive effect, indicated the existence of a hierarchy in this peatland wherein the feather mosses are subordinates to the Sphagnum mosses. Relative competitive performance, which was calculated relative to the growth of the phytometer in monoculture, indicated that S. magellanicum exhibited the greatest competitive effect. Sphagnum magellanicum may be a strong competitor and partially inhibit S. fuscum from occupying its full fundamental niche. The competitive ability of S. fuscum and S. angustifolium in this peatland is low relative to that of the other study species. The feather mosses did not demonstrate competitive effect and may have facilitated growth of the phytometer.Key words: bryophyte, competition, feather moss, peatland, phytometer, Sphagnum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".