Electrical isolation of electrodes with submicron separation in a digital optical switch
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electrodes in a carrier-injection-based digital optical switch are separated by a gap of less than 1μm. Good switch performance requires minimal current spreading and effective electrical isolation of these two electrodes without perturbing the underlying guided optical fields. Two methods of such isolation are modeled and experimentally compared. One is the etching of an e-beam-defined 0.5-μm-wide trench down to an etch stop layer, and the other is the implanting of oxygen ions using the electrodes as a shadow mask. Electrical simulation results suggest that injected current magnitudes and carrier concentration profiles are similar with both the trench and the ion implant, and so they should be equally effective in preventing current flow between the two branches. However, experimental results show that ion implantation produces better switching contrasts of greater than 20dB. We attribute this to the fact that implantation using the electrodes as a shadow mask results in an injected carrier distribution that more accurately reproduces the shape of the overlying electrode.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".