Improved resolution with microchip‐based enhanced field inversion electrophoresis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present an improvement of the field inversion electrophoresis (FIE) method in which the passage of sample such as DNA back and forth within a short length of a microchannel can provide a similar resolution to that of a significantly longer microchannel. In constant field FIE the application of an alternating potential (e.g., +/- V) over short periods of time (e.g., several Hz) can provide enhanced separations of DNA fragments. In contrast, the present method consists of a series of separations, each of much longer duration, under high and low fields in such a way that the resolution is enhanced. This method is readily modeled and allows improved resolution to be obtained from extremely short microchannels (e.g., 8 mm) while requiring relatively low applied voltages (e.g., less than 600 V). An additional advantage is that this method can allow for the same equipment to be used in a rapid, low-resolution mode or in a slower, high-resolution mode through what might be referred to as an automated "zoom" capability. We believe that this method may facilitate the integration of microfluidic devices and microelectronic devices by allowing these devices to be of a similar small scale (< 1 cm).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".