Biosynthesis and Enzymatic Characterization of Human SKI-1/S1P and the Processing of Its Inhibitory Prosegment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biochemical and enzymatic characterization of the novel human subtilase hSKI-1 was carried out in various cell lines. Within the endoplasmic reticulum of LoVo cells, proSKI-1 is converted to SKI-1 by processing of its prosegment into 26-, 24-, 14-, 10-, and 8-kDa products, some of which remain tightly associated with the enzyme. N-terminal sequencing and mass spectrometric analysis were used to map the cleavage sites of the most abundant fragments, which were confirmed by synthetic peptide processing. To characterize its in vitro enzymatic properties, we generated a secreted form of SKI-1. Our data demonstrate that SKI-1 is a Ca(2+)-dependent proteinase exhibiting optimal cleavage at pH 6.5. We present evidence that SKI-1 processes peptides mimicking the cleavage sites of the SKI-1 prosegment, pro-brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and the sterol regulatory element-binding protein SREBP-2. Among the candidate peptides encompassing sections of the SKI-1 prosegment, the RSLK(137)- and RRLL(186)-containing peptides were best cleaved by this enzyme. Mutagenesis of the latter peptide allowed us to develop an efficiently processed SKI-1 substrate and to assess the importance of several P and P' residues. Finally, we demonstrate that, in vitro, recombinant prosegments of SKI-1 inhibit its activity with apparent inhibitor constants of 100-200 nM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".