MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116166076 · doi:10.1139/o07-005

Adult asthmatics display exaggerated IFNγ responses to human metapneumovirus and respiratory syncytial virusThis paper is one of a selection of papers in this Special Issue, entitled International Symposium on Recent Advances in Molecular, Clinical, and Social Medicine, and has undergone the Journal's usual peer-review process.

2007· article· en· W2116166076 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Renée N. Douville, Nathalie Bastien, Yan Li, F. Estelle R. Simons, Kent T. HayGlass

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaCanadian Science Centre for Human and Animal HealthManitoba Health
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research ChairsResearch ManitobaUniversity of ManitobaManitoba Health Research Council
KeywordsHuman metapneumovirusImmunologyAsthmaVirusRespiratory systemRhinovirusMedicineCytokineImmune systemRespiratory tract infectionsVirologyBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human metapneumovirus and respiratory syncytial virus are RNA viruses associated with lower respiratory tract infections. Regular symptomatic re-infection and sequelae are common, particularly in individuals with pre-existing respiratory diseases, such as asthma. Our understanding of virus-dependent cytokine responses and potential differences between allergic asthmatics and non-asthmatics is limited. To test our hypothesis that adults with mild allergic asthma, the most common form of this disease, exhibit distinct pro-inflammatory responses, we developed a model using acute in vitro infection of fresh peripheral blood mononuclear cells. For both viruses, the production of innate-immunity-associated IL-6 and IL-10 was indistinguishable in the 2 populations. Type 1 cytokine production dominated adaptive immune responses in both asthmatic and non-asthmatic individuals. Surprisingly, asthmatics exhibited stronger pro-inflammatory IFNgamma production in response to human metapneumovirus than non-asthmatic adults (p = 0.01), with a similar, but statistically nonsignificant trend in the respiratory-syncytial-virus-stimulated response. Neutralizing IL-10 did not enhance the intensity of IFNgamma responses, demonstrating that this pro-inflammatory bias is not counter-regulated by IL-10. Finally, anti-TLR4 blocked lipopolysaccharide, but not respiratory-syncytial-virus-driven cytokine production. Collectively, the data demonstrate that asthma is characterized by markedly stronger pro-inflammatory IFNgamma responses to pneumoviruses than their non-asthmatic counterparts. This distinctive pattern of viral immunity may contribute to a worsening of asthma symptoms during respiratory virus infections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207