MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116267660 · doi:10.1002/jgrb.50294

Sea level variations during snowball Earth formation and evolution: 2. The influence of Earth's rotation

2013· article· en· W2116267660 on OpenAlexafffund
Yonggang Liu, W. R. Peltier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of TorontoCompute Canada
KeywordsMantle (geology)Earth's rotationLithosphereSnowball EarthGeologyConvectionGeophysicsMantle convectionSea levelGeodesyMechanicsPhysicsOceanographyTectonicsPaleontologyGlacial period

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preliminary analyses are described of the influence of snowball Earth formation on the rotational state of the Earth as well as its feedback onto relative sea level. We demonstrate that a sufficiently large excess ellipticity of the Earth as might be expected to arise due to the mantle convection process acts to stabilize the rotational axis significantly so that the associated relative sea level change would be negligible. If no such excess ellipticity were characteristic of Neoproterozoic time, then increasing the thickness of the elastic lithosphere significantly promotes true polar wander (TPW) and the associated relative sea level change. On the contrary, increasing the viscosity of the lower mantle has an equally significant but opposite effect. TPW due to ice sheets formation for the 720 Ma and 570 Ma continental configurations (approximate Marinoan) can reach more than 5° and 10° in 10 Myr for viscosity model VM5a, and the associated maximum relative sea level changes at this time reach 26 m and 49 m, respectively. However, if a 1°/Myr TPW due to the action of the mantle convection process is assumed to be superimposed, then these values increase to 70 m and 101 m respectively. Compared to the analyses in which rotational influence is entirely neglected, the probability density distribution of freeboard values obtained here is almost the same except that the tails of the distribution are broadened, making it more difficult to accurately infer continental ice volume during snowball Earth events from observed freeboard changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207