European Society of Clinical Pharmacists International Workshop on Geriatrics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The European Society of Clinical Pharmacists (ESCP)held its third annual international meeting on May 5 and 6 in Utrecht in The Netherlands. This year the focus was on geriatrics. It was chaired by Louise Mallet (Montreal, Canada) who coordinated the scientific committee, which included Annemie Somers (Belgium), Ulrika Gillese (Sweden), Marcel Bouvy (The Netherlands), Hannelore Kreckel (Germany), Erik Gerbrands (The Netherlands) and Piera Polidori (Italy). The attendance was mainly composed of clinical pharmacists who have an interest in geriatrics. A number of the 110 participants were present at this workshop from different countries around the world. The 2-day meeting was organized around plenary sessions, interactive workshop sessions, oral communications and poster presentations. The plenary sessions explored four topics, namely the appropriateness of prescribing in older patients, the specific needs for research in geriatrics, frailty in the elderly and an update on dementia in the elderly. Cecilia Bernsten, president of ESCP, welcomed the participants on May 5 by emphasizing the growing role of pharmacists in taking care of older patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".