Antibody Response and Virus Shedding of Chickens Inoculated with Left End Deleted Fowl Adenovirus 9-Based Recombinant Viruses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The nonpathogenic fowl adenoviruses (FAdVs) are suitable recombinant virus vectors. Two different replication-competent FAdV-9-based recombinant viruses carrying the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) gene within a nonessential DNA sequence at the left end genomic region were tested in chickens to study the antibody response by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to both the foreign proteins, EGFP and FAdV-9, and virus shedding through the feces. All inoculations were done intramuscularly: groups 1 and 2 with the recombinant viruses and group 3 with the wild-type FAdV-9 virus. Group 4 was mock inoculated. Sentinel birds also were included in groups 1-3 to study virus transmission. Boosting inoculations were done in all groups at 2, 3, and 4 wk after the first inoculation. Antibodies to EGFP were detected at 3-7 wk postinoculation in groups 1 and 2 only. Antibody response to FAdV-9 in groups 1-3 did not differ significantly (P > 0.06). Virus was not detected in the feces of chickens in groups 1 and 2, including the sentinel birds, but virus was present in the feces of chickens in group 3, including the sentinel birds. These results further supported our previous findings regarding the suitability of the nonessential region at the left end of the viral genome as an insertion site for foreign genes and its importance in in vivo replication. In this work, we demonstrated the potential of FAdV-9-based recombinant viruses as vaccines for poultry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".