Epitaxial Bi∕GaAs diodes via electrodeposition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Epitaxial Bi∕GaAs diodes have been formed by electrodeposition from bismuth nitrate and ammonium sulfate ((NH4)2SO4) aqueous solutions. Bi grows (0001) oriented on both GaAs (111)B and (001) substrates while it tilts 16° to a (011̱8) surface orientation for (011) GaAs. The metal orients in all cases with its {112̱0} planes parallel the GaAs {110} planes. Diodes prepared on (001), (111)B, and (011) wafers have current-voltage barrier heights ΦBIV that vary from 0.74, to 0.76, to 0.83eV (n=1.01–1.11), respectively. These barrier heights straggle values from earlier reports for polycrystalline Bi deposited by ultrahigh vacuum techniques or electrodeposition. Barrier heights measured from high frequency, capacitance-voltage characteristics are higher than the ΦBIV results, 0.06–1.5eV, as a function of the GaAs orientation, increasing in value in order of (011), (001), to (111)B. This is explained by a combination of image force lowering and field emission corrections, and interface state/dipoles that are likely dependent on the GaAs orientation and on the degree of (0001) Bi alignment. These results are supported by cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy investigations indicating abrupt Bi∕GaAs interfaces without evidence of a significant interfacial oxide or reacted layer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it