MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116477781 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2007.524

A Novel Gnutella Application Layer Multicast Protocol for Collaborative Virtual Environments over Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks

2007· article· en· W2116477781 on OpenAlexaff
Azzedine Boukerche, Anis Zarrad, Regina B. Araújo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkComputer scienceMulticastPragmatic General MulticastDistributed computingProtocol Independent MulticastReliable multicastSource-specific multicastIP multicastApplication layerXcastWireless ad hoc networkOperating systemWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Collaborative virtual environments (CVEs) such as massive multiuser 3D games and military training environments can place strict requirements on networks when participating users share the 3D virtual environment through mobile devices in an ad-hoc network. In this paper, the authors show how a CVE application can benefit from the application layer multicast when deployed on the Gnutella peer-to-peer network over an ad-hoc network. The authors propose a protocol called GALM (Gnutella application layer multicast). GALM requires no infrastructure support such as a multicast router to maintain the group state. It has the following characteristics: a) it is adaptable to mobility and network group size by managing the mobile device resources by using gateway node, b) it is reliable; the CVE application can choose at a running time the adequate transport protocol for each data type - for example, using TCP for scene and object data and RTP to send video and audio data, c) it is independent from the lower layer; any link failure or mobility in the physical layer will not affect the application layer, eliminating the need to perform a multicast tree reconfiguration, d) it has link quality; therefore, a cross layer can be used between the network and the application layer in order to provide optimal paths in the multicast tree configuration process. In addition, the protocol handles tolerance to mobility and multicast tree recovery using a smart logical Gnutella network that is based on a novel discovery technique in which mobile nodes are found by means of both their state and position in the CVE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeer-to-Peer Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207