Nitric Oxide Produced by a Novel Nitric Oxide Synthase Isoform is Necessary for Gonadotropin‐Releasing Hormone‐Induced Growth Hormone Secretion Via a cGMP‐Dependent Mechanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The involvement of nitric oxide (NO) in the regulation of goldfish growth hormone (GH) secretion was further characterized using primary cultures of dispersed goldfish pituitary cells. Western blots revealed the presence of an inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)-like protein of approximately 120 kDa in cytosol/plasma membrane extracts. By contrast, brain NOS-immunoreactive proteins of approximately 120-140 kDa were occasionally detected in a cytoskeleton/organelle fraction but were absent from cytosol/plasma membrane extracts. The NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) acutely increased GH secretion but this response was not observed in the presence of either a NO scavenger (PTIO) or a soluble guanylate cyclase inhibitor (ODQ). SNP also significantly increased the levels of cyclic (c)GMP in somatotrope-enriched cell populations. Treatments with 1400W (iNOS inhibitor), PTIO and rutin hydrate (NO scavengers) and ODQ abolished the acute GH-release response to two endogenous gonadotropin-releasing hormones (GnRH). 1400W, rutin hydrate, PTIO and ODQ alone did not significantly alter basal GH secretion. Together, these results establish that an iNOS-like peptide is constitutively present in the pituitary of the goldfish. Furthermore, these data suggest that NO, most likely through the generation of cGMP, is a necessary signal transduction component of GnRH-induced GH secretion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".