MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116616982 · doi:10.1186/1756-8935-6-s1-p9

Genome-wide mapping of chromatin marks from 1,000 cells to study epigenetic reprogramming in primordial germ cells

2013· article· en· W2116616982 on OpenAlexaff
Julie Brind’Amour, Sheng Liu, Aaron Bogutz, Matthew C. Lorincz

Bibliographic record

VenueEpigenetics & Chromatin · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyReprogrammingChromatinEpigeneticsGermlineDNA methylationGeneticsHistoneDeep sequencingGerm cellChromatin immunoprecipitationGenomeComputational biologyDNAGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Germline development is characterized by genome-wide reprogramming of DNA methylation. Recent work has enlightened the dynamics of DNA methylation in primordial germ cells (PGCs), but knowledge of histone modification dynamics at these developmental stages remains limited, mostly due to the difficulty in obtaining enough high quality chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) material for sequencing. Previous work in our laboratory has demonstrated the importance of histone methyltransferases in silencing retroelements [1] and a subset of germline-specific genes [2] in embryonic stem cells. Here, we sought to develop a reliable ChIP-sequencing protocol to study the dynamics of histone modification during the DNA methylation reprogramming that occurs in PGCs. We have developed a scaled down native ChIP and sequencing library construction protocol that can be performed on small cell numbers. We optimized sample fragmentation, antibody concentration, ChIP conditions, library construction and amplification to generate high quality, high resolution H3K9me3 sequencing libraries from as little as 1,000 embryonic stem cells. Paired-end sequencing (Illumina HiSeq) of these pooled and indexed libraries generated an average of 28 million aligned read pairs (with 6 libraries per sequencing lane), with under 20% duplicate reads, for an average of 23 million unique read pairs. Under optimized conditions, we found that over 85% of the peaks identified using standard native ChIP-sequencing (using 2 million cells as starting material) were also detected by our small cell number native ChIP-seq protocol. We also found excellent reproducibility between independent ChIP experiments. Using this optimized small cell number native ChIP-seq protocol, we generated genome-wide H3 and H3K9me3 profiles from 1,000 E13.5 PGCs and identified a unique cohort of genes and retroelements enriched for this repressive mark. Integration of this chip-seq data with DNA methylation/WGBS and transcriptome data generated at the same developmental stage will be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpigenetics & ChromatinSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207