MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116640797 · doi:10.1081/txr-200027872

The Economic Impact of Bt Corn Resulting from Mycotoxin Reduction

2004· article· en· W2116640797 on OpenAlexaff
Felicia Wu, J. David Miller, Elizabeth A. Casman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Toxicology Toxin Reviews · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsMycotoxinEconomic impact analysisReduction (mathematics)Environmental scienceToxicologyBiologyBiotechnologyEconomicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The insecticidal proteins in genetically modified hybrid Bt corn (Zea mays spp.) reduce insect damage, which in turn can reduce infection of the grain by mycotoxigenic fungi. Lower levels of Fusarium mycotoxins, fumonisin, and deoxynivalenol in Bt corn could have significant market and health impacts, both in the United States and around the world. These impacts are foregone losses through market rejection, human health losses, and animal health losses. We estimate that at current planting levels, Bt corn saves farmers in the United States about $17 million annually through reduced fumonisin and deoxynivalenol damage alone. Though not extensively grown in developing countries, the benefits there in mycotoxin reduction could be even more significant, particularly in regions where corn is a staple in the human diet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Toxicology Toxin ReviewsSame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207