What does ‘active disease’ mean? patient and parent perceptions of disease activity in the systemic arthritis form of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SO-JIA)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The systemic onset form of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SO-JIA) is a very serious chronic illness of childhood. At present, there is no specific tool to measure disease activity for SO-JIA. Our long-term goal is to develop a disease activity measure for SO-JIA using a consensus (Delphi) approach. In preparation for the development of this measure, we interviewed both patients and their parents. We sought to elicit specific items reflecting their perceptions of active disease that may be considered for inclusion in a disease activity measure for SO-JIA. METHODS: SO-JIA patients followed at The Hospital for Sick Children and their parents were chosen by purposive sampling. A trained research coordinator interviewed all participants using open-ended questions to elicit aspects of disease activity (defined as reversible manifestations of disease) of relevance to families. A list of these aspects was then generated and organized by categories to allow item reduction. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (eight females) with a mean age of 11.8 yr (mean disease duration 5.2 yr) and their parents were interviewed. A total of 292 items were generated, with an average of 11 items generated per interview. Arthralgia, ambulation difficulties, rash, decreased energy level and fever were the most common items mentioned by patients and their parents. Mood disturbances, decreased activity levels, arthritis severity and decreased school attendance were also common items identified as relevant aspects of disease activity. CONCLUSION: This study has allowed us to include patient and parent perspectives in preparation for developing a disease activity measure for SO-JIA. The resulting items will be added to future physician surveys in the further development and validation of a disease activity measure for SO-JIA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".