Incomplete pole orientation of kinetochores in complex meiotic metaphase I configurations delays metaphase–anaphase transition in<i>Secale</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To prevent unbalanced chromosome segregation, meiotic metaphase I - anaphase I transition is carefully regulated by delaying anaphase until all kinetochores are well oriented (anaphase checkpoint) in mammals and insects. In plants this has not yet been established. In heterozygotes of two reciprocal translocations of Secale cereale, with one chromosome replaced by its two telocentric arms, anaphase delay was correlated with the orientation of the kinetochores of the complex of five chromosomes. The terminal kinetochores of the half chromosomes were readily elongated and pole oriented. Chains of five chromosomes with all five kinetochores orienting on alternate poles where the first to start anaphase. Kinetochores of two adjacent chromosomes when oriented on the same pole were partly shielded and less well pole directed. Anaphase was delayed. Cells with this configuration accumulated during anther development. Kinetochores in metacentric chromosomes lacking chiasmata in one arm (in trivalents and bivalents) were slightly better pole oriented and delayed anaphase less. Release of chromatid cohesion as triggered by kinetochore stretch is apparently delayed by inadequate exposition and pole orientation of the kinetochores. It is a mild form of an anaphase checkpoint, in normal material synchronizing bivalent segregation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".