MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116711374 · doi:10.1086/340123

Adhesion and Virulence Properties of Epidemic Canadian Methicillin‐Resistant<i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>Strain 1: Identification of Novel Adhesion Functions Associated with Plasmin‐Sensitive Surface Protein

2002· article· en· W2116711374 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mario Huesca, Robert Peralta, Daniel N. Sauder, Andrew E. Simor, Martin J. McGavin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsVirulenceMicrobiologyPlasminStaphylococcus aureusBiologyGlycolipidExtracellular matrixStrain (injury)PhenotypeExtracellularVirulence factorAdhesionBacteriaChemistryGeneticsGeneBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epidemic Canadian methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain 1 (CMRSA-1) comprises related subtypes that differ in phenotype and prevalence, with subtypes 1A, 1B, and 1D representing 1%, 71%, and 18%, respectively, of total CMRSA-1 isolates. The predominant CMRSA-1B subtype possesses a variant of the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec, harboring pls, which encodes plasmin-sensitive surface protein (Pls). CMRSA-1B cells that express Pls exhibited poor adhesion to keratinocyte extracellular matrix. However, CMRSA-1B and purified Pls adhered to cellular lipids and glycolipids, and Pls promoted bacterial cell-cell interactions. Although exoprotein expression was restricted to a precursor form of lipase in CMRSA-1B, it was not attenuated in virulence relative to CMRSA-1A, which exhibits normal exoprotein expression. In contrast, CMRSA-1D exhibited a pleiotropic defect in exoprotein expression and attenuated virulence relative to CMRSA-1A. These data indicate that the high transmissibility of CMRSA-1B was not achieved at the expense of attenuated virulence and that Pls confers a novel adhesion mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusFrench-language works237,207