Pregnancy outcomes in women with elevated levels of fetal hemoglobin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Elevated maternal levels of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) present a unique situation where both mother and fetus produce hemoglobin with equivalent oxygen affinities. We aimed to determine pregnancy outcomes in women with persistently elevated HbF. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, women with HbF levels exceeding 10% were identified by searching a provincial database. Maternal, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes were extracted from chart reviews performed at two hospitals. RESULTS: Twenty-two women with a total of 43 pregnancies and 33 live births were identified. Maternal levels of HbF ranged between 11 and 100%. Women with HbF ≥ 70% were significantly more likely to deliver growth-restricted or small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses compared to the group of women with HbF < 70% (100% versus 8%; p < 0.01). Three women (4/32 pregnancies) received blood transfusions, which was unrelated to HbF levels. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancies complicated by maternal HbF levels ≥ 70% are at increased risk of intra-uterine growth restriction or SGA fetuses. Increased antenatal surveillance is suggested.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".