Induction of T-cell development from human cord blood hematopoietic stem cells by Delta-like 1 in vitro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Notch signaling pathway plays a key role at several stages of T-lymphocyte differentiation. However, it remained unclear whether signals induced by the Notch ligand Delta-like 1 could support full T-cell differentiation from a defined source of human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in vitro. Here, we show that human cord blood-derived HSCs cultured on Delta-like 1-expressing OP9 stromal cells undergo efficient T-cell lineage commitment and sustained T-cell differentiation. A normal stage-specific program of T-cell development was observed, including the generation of CD4 and CD8 alpha beta-T-cell receptor (TCR)-bearing cells. Induction of T-cell differentiation was dependent on the expression of Delta-like 1 by the OP9 cells. Stimulation of the in vitro-differentiated T cells by TCR engagement induced the expression of T-cell activation markers and costimulatory receptors. These results establish an efficient in vitro coculture system for the generation of T cells from human HSCs, providing a new avenue for the study of early T-cell differentiation and function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".