MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117044074 · doi:10.1186/1471-2210-7-s1-p37

Cardiorenal actions of a novel chimeric natriuretic peptide, CD-NP, as compared to C-type natriuretic peptide, in the normal dog

2007· article· en· W2117044074 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Candace YW Lee, Guido Boerrigter, Gail J. Harty, John C. Burnett

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Pharmacology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
KeywordsNatriuretic peptideNPR2NPR1PeptideInternal medicineReceptorEndocrinologyDiureticMedicinePharmacologyChemistryBiochemistryHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The novel chimeric natriuretic peptide, CD-NP, is a Mayodesigned cGMP-activating synthetic peptide that consists of the 22-amino-acid (AA) residues of C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) and the 15-AA C-terminal extension of Dendroaspis natriuretic peptide (DNP) [1]. The rationale for the design of CD-NP was to transform CNP, which activates natriuretic peptide receptor-B (NPR-B) and is natriuretic, diuretic and less hypotensive than ANP and BNP which activate NPR-A into a CNP-like peptide with added renal actions. The goal of this investigation was to directly compare the cardiorenal profile of CD-NP to that of CNP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC PharmacologySame topicHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207