Injection-moulded biocomposites from polylactic acid (PLA) and recycled carbon fibre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The properties of injection-moulded polylactic acid (PLA) and recycled carbon fibre composites are examined in this study. Measurement of tensile, flexural, and impact resistance properties quantify the mechanical properties of the composites with increased fibre loading. Tensile strength and modulus of PLA and 30 wt% carbon fibre composite were found to increase by 73% and 438%, while flexural strength and modulus of carbon fibre composite increased by 53% and 400% compared to neat PLA. Consequently, storage modulus measured by dynamic mechanical analysis also improved with the addition of carbon fibre. Mechanical properties were correlated with the Hirsch model. Composite morphological study through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed pullout and partial wetting of fibre by matrix along with agglomeration. Differential scanning calorimetry study of the composites showed minor increase in relative crystallinity and crystallization temperature, while melting and cold crystallization temperatures were found to decrease due to the high-thermal conductivity of carbon fibre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".