MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2117073583 · doi:10.3141/2203-23

Impacts of Reduced Tire Pressure on Strain Response of Thaw-Weakened, Low-Volume Roads in Manitoba, Canada

2011· article· en· W2117073583 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Qingfan Liu, Leonnie Kavanagh, Ahmed Shalaby

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsTruckEnvironmental scienceStrain gaugeTraffic volumeAsphaltSpring (device)Bearing capacityGeotechnical engineeringVolume (thermodynamics)Asphalt pavementStructural engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringAutomotive engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The spring thaw period significantly reduces the bearing capacity of low-volume asphalt roads. To compensate for the reduced bearing capacity, highway agencies apply spring load restrictions (SLR) to limit the damage caused by heavy loads during the period when the road is weakened by thaw. Although the imposition of SLR may reduce road damage, it has a major impact on truck productivity. An alternative to reducing truck loads during the spring is the reduction of truck tire pressure. The reduced tire pressure lowers the tire–pavement contact pressure and the associated damage during the spring period. In 2008, asphalt strain gauges were installed in a section of a low-volume haul road in Manitoba, Canada. Field testing was conducted in the spring and fall of 2009 with a double semitrailer or B-Train equipped with a semiautomated tire pressure control system. The tests were conducted at various loads and speeds and at normal and reduced tire pressures. The results of the field testing showed that when the tire pressure was reduced by 50%, the measured maximum tensile strain at the bottom of the asphalt layer decreased by an average of 15% to 20%. The effects of gauge orientation, truck speed, and tire offset from the strain gauge were analyzed and are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board→Same topicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation→French-language works237,207→