Genome Analysis Identifies the p15<sup>ink4b</sup> Tumor Suppressor as a Direct Target of the ZNF217/CoREST Complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ZNF217 oncoprotein is a constituent of a core transcriptional complex that includes CoREST, histone deacetylase 1/2, lysine demethylase 1, and the C-terminal binding protein 1/2. We have combined genome-wide expression profiling and chromatin immunoprecipitation with directed selection and ligation (ChIP-DSL) to identify a subset of genes directly regulated by ZNF217. Our results establish p15(ink4b) as a direct target of the ZNF217 complex. Downregulation of ZNF217 in MCF-7 breast cancer cells resulted in a dramatic increase in p15(ink4b) expression and coincided with increases in dimethylation of H3-K4 and, surprisingly, a decrease in K9/K14-H3 acetylation. Stimulation of HaCaT cells with transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) resulted in a release of ZNF217 and a concomitant binding of SMAD2 to the proximal promoter, which preceded increases in ink4b protein expression. Furthermore, the changes in chromatin marks at the p15(ink4b) promoter following TGF-beta stimulation were similar to those observed following ZNF217 downregulation. Collectively, these results establish the ZNF217 complex as a novel negative regulator of the p15(ink4b) gene and may constitute an important link between amplification of ZNF217 and the loss of TGF-beta responsiveness in breast cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".