MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117151278

스코필드의 의료(교육)ㆍ사회선교와 3ㆍ1독립운동

2011· article· ko· W2117151278 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
李萬烈

Bibliographic record

Venue한국근현대사연구 · 2011
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicKorean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndependence (probability theory)Government (linguistics)DenialHuman rightsPolitical scienceColonialismLawTorturePsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This manuscript examines the medical mission work and social mission activities of Dr. Frank W. Schofield(1889~1970), a medical missionary sent to Korea by the Presbyterian Church in Canada. Arriving in Korea in November, 1916, Schofield had a keen interest in the human rights of Koreans and their independence, and criticized the Japanese colonial policies. Actively supporting the March First Independence Movement as a foreigner, he was forced to leave and go back to Canada on April, 1920, for exposing the atrocities of the Japanese Government-General in Korea. After retiring from his work as a veterinary professor in Canada, Schofield returned to Korea in 1958 upon the invitation of the Korean government, taught at the College of Veterinary Medicine Seoul National University, and passed away in Seoul, April, 1970, at the age of 81. During the March First Independence Movement, Schofield strived to retain its living evidence, as well as assisting the wounded to hospitals and visiting prisons to encourage the jailed. He visited the horrendous remains of Jeam-ri and Suchon-ri, documenting the evidence with photographs and writings. Schofield also met with officials of the Japanese Government-General, opposing the torture of Koreans and denial of human rights and demanding policy changes. The changes in the jail system and prisoner life after the March First Independence Movement were the result of his persistent efforts. This is why he is dubbed “the 34th person of the March First Independence Movement.” As Schofield collected and exposed data on the brutality of the Japanese, this led to changes in the Japanese Government-General policies. On July 10, 1919, along with other Canadian missionaries, he visited the Governor-General Hasegawa, opposing the cruel treatment of the March First Independence Movement participants. Schofield’s data on the March First Independence Movement, which was sent to the Commission on Relations with the Orient, within the Federal Council of the Churches of Christ in America, was published in The Korean Situation, exposing the atrocities of Japan and inciting international uprise as well as strong pressure on the Japanese government. The change in Japan’s policy after the March First Independence Movement, from a military dictatorial government to a so-called ‘culture-oriented politics’ -albeit intrinsically feigned- is related to the pressure of missionaries, foreigners, and international objection. Schofield was at the center of this pressure on the Japanese government, which is quite the comparison to the attitude of other missionaries who overlooked Japanese brutality on the premise of separation of politics and religion. With a puritan spirit and faith, Schofield taught at the Severance Medical School and led bible study with young Koreans. When Japan introduced a prostitutializing policy, he led the abolition movement against licensed prostitution for the moral purity of young Koreans, as well as supporting general improvement of the human rights of Koreans. This was because he considered this as another independence movement for Koreans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue한국근현대사연구Same topicKorean Peninsula Historical and Political StudiesFrench-language works237,207