Fluorinated aminoalkoxide CuII complexes: new CVD precursors for deposition of copper metal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Volatile low-melting CuII metal complexes of formula Cu[OC(CF3)R1CH2NHR2]2 (R1 = CF3 or CH3; R2 = CH2CH2OMe, Bui, or But) and Cu[OC(CF3)R1CH2NMe2]2 (R1 = CF3 or CH3) have been synthesized and characterized by spectroscopic methods. A single-crystal X-ray diffraction study on Cu[OC(CF3)2CH2NHCH2CH2OMe]2 shows that one methoxyethyl group of the aminoalkoxide ligand forms an intramolecular dative bond to the Cu atom to produce a square-pyramidal geometry at the metal center, while the second is linked to the Cu atom of the adjacent molecule, giving an N2O4 octahedral coordination arrangement. For the second Bui-substituted complex, Cu[OC(CF3)2CH2NHBui]2, the X-ray structural analysis demonstrated an N2O2 square-planar geometry, with one alkoxide oxygen atom forming strong H-bonding to an adjacent water molecule. Metal CVD experiments were carried out, showing that the source reagents Cu[OC(CF3)2CH2NHBui]2, Cu[OC(CF3)2CH2NHBut]2, and Cu[OCMe(CF3)CH2NHBui]2, which possess a secondary amino group, are capable of depositing copper metal at temperatures of 250–300 °C under inert Ar carrier gas, while Cu[OCMe(CF3)CH2NMe2]2, with a tertiary amine group, requires the use of reductive H2 carrier gas to induce metal deposition at lower temperatures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".