MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117198185 · doi:10.1016/s1010-7940(01)00583-8

Outcome of non-elective coronary artery bypass grafting without cardio-pulmonary bypass

2001· article· en· W2117198185 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Delvin Varghese

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiopulmonary bypassAnginaArteryIntensive care unitCardiologyMyocardial infarctionAnastomosisInternal medicineSurgeryDialysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: There is limited experience in the use of beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in emergency and urgent cases. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the safety and efficacy of this technique when used in a non-elective setting. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all urgent and emergency cases of coronary artery bypass grafting performed without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) from July 1999 to February 2000. There were 35 patients in total. The mean age was 64.8+/-11.9. Twenty-six (74.3%) patients had Canadian Cardiovascular Society grade 4 angina. Twenty-six patients (74.3%) had triple vessel disease. Eleven patients (31.4%) were on preoperative IV nitrates and nine patients (25.7%) had a preoperative IABP (intra aortic balloon pump). Three patients (8.6%) had suffered a preoperative cardiac arrest during coronary angiography. Other associated significant risk factors were smoking (60%), hypertension (40%), hypercholesterolemia (57.1%) and previous Q wave myocardial infarction (31.4%). RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (62.9%) were classified as being urgent and 13 patients (37.1%) were classified as emergencies. The mean number of anastomoses performed were 2.8+/-0.8 (range 1-4) with 68.6% of patients under going triple or quadruple vessel grafting. All patients (100%) received at least one arterial graft. There was no conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass. The main postoperative complications were--supraventricular arrhythmias eight (22.9%), low cardiac output seven (20%) and postoperative HF/dialysis two (5.7%). The median postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 27.5 h. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 8.3+/-3.1 days. One patient died (2.9%) at the eighth day after surgery due to postoperative myocardial infarction, multi-organ failure secondary to the septicaemia and ventricular arrest. CONCLUSION: Non-elective CABG without CPB is feasible and safe with modern cardiac stabilization devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic SurgerySame topicCardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207