MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117210846 · doi:10.1099/vir.0.2008/001222-0

Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus-1 entry using vectors expressing a multimeric hammerhead ribozyme targeting the CCR5 mRNA

2008· article· en· W2117210846 on OpenAlexafffund
Reza Nazari, Xue Zhong, Sadhna Joshi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of General Virology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersOntario HIV Treatment Network
KeywordsHammerhead ribozymeRibozymeVirologyBiologyVirusMolecular biologyMammalian CPEB3 ribozymeViral replicationTransfectionCell cultureRNACell biologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rz1-7 is a multimeric hammerhead ribozyme targeting seven unique sites within the human CCR5 mRNA that is active in vitro. Mouse stem cell virus-based MGIN and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-based HEG1 vectors were used to express Rz1-7 in a human CD4+ T lymphoid cell line. Stable transductants expressed Rz1-7, which was further shown to be active, since CCR5 mRNA and surface CCR5 protein expression levels decreased. High levels of progeny virus were produced when the transduced cells were challenged with an X4-tropic HIV-1 (NL4-3) strain, suggesting that Rz1-7 expression does not affect X4-tropic virus replication. When the transduced cells expressing Rz1-7 were challenged with the R5-tropic HIV-1 (BaL) strain, 99-100% inhibition of progeny virus production was observed for the duration of the experiment (approximately 2 months). When the cells were precultured for 2-3 months prior to HIV-1 infection, inhibition was more prominent in cells transduced with MGIN-Rz1-7 than with HEG1-Rz1-7. Inhibition occurred at the level of viral entry, as no HIV-1 DNA could be detected. These results demonstrate that Rz1-7 confers excellent inhibition of R5-tropic HIV-1 replication at the level of entry. Therefore, we anticipate that this multimeric ribozyme will be beneficial for HIV-1 gene therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of General VirologySame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207