MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117241176 · doi:10.1139/w09-123

Sequences required for transcription termination at the intrinsic λ<i>tI</i>terminator

2010· article· en· W2117241176 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Miguel Martı́nez-Trujillo, Alejandra Sánchez‐Trujillo, Vı́ctor Ceja, Federico Ávila‐Moreno, Rosa María Bermúdez‐Cruz, Donald Court, Cecilia Montáñez

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsTerminator (solar)BiologyTranscription (linguistics)Molecular biologyExonucleaseTermination factorGalactokinaseNorthern blotGeneticsDNAMutantGeneRNAPhysicsRNA polymeraseEscherichia coliPolymerase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The lambdatI terminator is located approximately 280 bp beyond the lambdaint gene, and it has a typical structure of an intrinsic terminator. To identify sequences required for lambdatI transcription termination a set of deletion mutants were generated, either from the 5' or the 3' end onto the lambdatI region. The termination efficiency was determined by measuring galactokinase (galK) levels by Northern blot assays and by in vitro transcription termination. The importance of the uridines and the stability of the stem structure in the termination were demonstrated. The nontranscribed DNA beyond the 3' end also affects termination. Additionally, sequences upstream have a small effect on transcription termination. The in vivo RNA termination sites at lambdatI were determined by S1 mapping and were located at 8 different positions. Processing of transcripts from the 3' end confirmed the importance of the hairpin stem in protection against exonuclease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFrench-language works237,207