A tutorial on the precessional behaviour of hydrogen nuclei in external magnetic fields
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this tutorial is to derive the precessional characteristics of the magnetic moments of hydrogen nuclei in the presence of a constant external magnetic field using the Dirac bra-ket formulation of quantum mechanics (QM). This behaviour has many applications, most notably in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Many NMR and MR imaging textbooks claim that the QM expectation value of the magnetic moment of a proton in a magnetic field reduces to the classical picture of a precessing magnetic dipole. This paper validates this conclusion by reducing the cumbersome QM integrals using Dirac notation and matrix algebra, and then comparing this result with the classical picture. It illustrates the connections between the quantum and classical pictures and demonstrates quantitatively how they differ and how they are similar. This tutorial targets students and researchers interested in the fundamental physics behind the MR phenomenon and assumes that the reader has a basic understanding of QM. This may be helpful for undergraduate QM students learning about spin angular momentum and Dirac notation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".