Response and remission are associated with improved quality of life, employment and disability status, hours worked, and productivity of patients with ulcerative colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Impairment of health-related quality of life, employment, and productivity has been documented in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Using prospectively collected data from the Active Ulcerative Colitis Trials 1 and 2, we examined the impact of clinical response or remission, as defined using the Mayo score, on health-related quality of life, employment, disability, productivity, and hours worked per week. These analyses were based on observed data and included all 728 patients, regardless of their randomized treatment group (i.e., placebo and infliximab patients were grouped for analysis). Changes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) scores among nonresponders, responders, and patients in remission were compared. In addition, changes in employment, disability status, productivity, and hours worked per week of patients in clinical remission and patients not in clinical remission were compared. RESULTS: Ulcerative colitis patients in clinical response or remission had significantly improved IBDQ and SF-36 scores at week 30 compared with those of nonresponders (P<0.001). Among those not employed at baseline, including those receiving disability compensation, greater percentages of patients in remission at week 30 were employed (20.6%) and not receiving disability compensation (58.8%) than were those not in remission (8.3% and 20.0%, respectively; P<0.05 for both comparisons). At week 30, improvements from baseline in productivity and both actual and fully productive hours worked per week were greater for patients in remission compared with those not in remission (P<0.05 for all three comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the validity of response and remission as defined using the Mayo score.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".