The effect of simulated obstructive apnoea on intraocular pressure and pulsatile ocular blood flow in healthy young adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the effect of negative inspiratory effort, as generated by the Mueller manoeuvre, on intraocular pressure (IOP) and pulsatile ocular blood flow (POBF) in healthy young adults. METHODS: Seven volunteers with no history of systemic or ocular disease were recruited (mean age 30.7 years, range 25-40 years, M/F: 4/3). After initial instruction and practice of the Mueller manoeuvre, baseline measurements of IOP and POBF were obtained for both eyes after 10 and 15 minutes of rest, respectively, in the supine position. Thereafter, the Mueller manoeuvre was performed creating a mouthpiece pressure of -20 cm H(2)O, for at least 15 seconds followed by a 5 minute rest. The manoeuvre was repeated with a mouthpiece pressure of -40 cm H(2)O. IOP and POBF were measured 5-15 seconds into the manoeuvre for both -20 cm H(2)O (M2A) and -40 cm H(2)O (M4A) and directly upon recovery (after two respiratory cycles) from each manoeuvre (M2B, M4B). Baseline measurements were compared using paired t test, whereas manoeuvre induced changes in IOP and POBF were analysed individually using repeated measures ANOVA with Student-Newman Keuls post hoc analyses. Linear regression analysis was used to investigate a dose-response effect. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between baseline measurements so they were subsequently pooled. There was a significant decrease in IOP for M2B (-9.2%, p<0.05), M4A (-13.8%, p<0.05), and M4B (-15.6%, p<0.05), relative to baseline. A dose-response relation was found for the effect of mouthpiece pressure on measurements 5-10 seconds into the manoeuvre (M2A and M4A, r = 0.54, p = 0.045). There was a trend of increased POBF relative to baseline for all measurements; however, significance was reached for M4B only (p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: It was shown that forced inspiratory efforts as generated by the Mueller manoeuvre are associated with a dose dependent decrease in IOP and a concomitant increase in pulsatile ocular blood flow.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".