Enhanced Second Harmonic Generation From Noncentrosymmetric Nanohole Arrays in a Gold Film
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A subwavelength aperture array in a gold film is fabricated for the purpose of second harmonic generation (SHG). The sunglass aperture shape is chosen to have an apex to increase the local field; however, unlike past research on double-hole structures, the inversion symmetry of the structure is intentionally broken to enhance the SHG. A systematic study of the influence of array periodicity and aperture shape is provided. The conditions for maximum SHG are discussed in terms of local field enhancement, excitation of the localized surface plasmon resonances, and the influence of array periodicity. Fully vectorial finite-difference electromagnetic calculations provide the effective index of the aperture modes, as well as the surface electric field to quantify the discussion. Both the sunglass and double-hole structures are promising for future implementation with less-expensive optical lithography since it is mainly composed of two holes; yet they produce sharp apexes for enhanced local field and thereby enhanced nonlinear light-matter interaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".