MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117436373 · doi:10.1109/pac.1993.309042

A pulse sequencer for the KAON factory beam chopper

2002· article· en· W2117436373 on OpenAlexaff
G. Waters, D. Bishop, Michael Barnes, G.D. Wait

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChopperPulse (music)OpticsCyclotronPhysicsTransmission lineBeam (structure)Electrical engineeringPulse-width modulationTransmission (telecommunications)VoltageDetectorEngineeringPlasmaNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The beam chopper consists of a low-loss transmission line center fed from a tetrode. The transmission line is terminated with a short-circuit at one end and an open-circuit deflector plate at the other end. The complex reflections from the open-circuited and short-circuited ends allow a single tetrode to generate a deflector pulse with good rise and fall times. The shape of the pulse at the deflector plate is extremely sensitive to the frequency of the grid driver pulse. A variation of 1 ns in timing significantly alters the deflector pulse. To provide the required pulse pattern, a FET based grid pulser and sequencer has been built. This sequencer is able to produce alternating narrow and wide 900 volt grid pulses with rise and fall times of 20 ns. Under computer supervision it is able to generate and control pulse patterns with a stability of /spl plusmn/125 ps. The pulse pattern is synchronized to an RF synthesizer to simulate operation with the 23 MHz TRIUMF cyclotron RF system. >

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207