Heat Shock Paradox and a New Role of Heat Shock Proteins and their Receptors as Anti-Inflammation Targets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article discusses the role of heat shock proteins (Hsps) and their receptors as anti-inflammation targets. Hsps are highly conserved proteins that protect cells against noxious or deleterious stimulus. Intracellular Hsps function as molecular chaperones governing protein assembly, folding, or transport and as anti-apoptotic regulators of cell signalling pathways leading to cell death. In addition, intracellular Hsps have recently been shown to have an anti-inflammatory role in various inflammatory conditions such as infection, ischemia/reperfusion injury, and cardiovascular diseases. However, the heat shock response and the induction of Hsps have paradoxical effects against cell injury. Hsp induction before a pro-inflammatory stimulus is clearly beneficial but Hsp induction after a pro-inflammatory stimulus is cytotoxic. These paradoxical and contradictory effects may result from the different functions of intracellular versus extracellular Hsps. Extracellular Hsps released from cells with compromised integrity may function as danger signals activating innate immunity by interacting with their receptors. Therefore, modulating the levels of intracellular Hsps or the activities of Hsp receptors will be potential drug targets in inflammation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".