Volumetric properties of the formation of double stranded DNA: A nearest‐neighbor analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The kinetics of the helix-coil transition have been studied by performing UV-monitored melting and reannealing curves of DNA and analyzing the resultant hysteresis between these curves. The analysis assumes a single-step bimolecular transition with duplex formation defined as the forward reaction. Volume parameters of the helix-coil transition were obtained by measuring the pressure dependence of the rate constants from 5-200 MPa. The data were interpreted in terms of several possible nearest-neighbor models, ranging from one to eleven parameters. Twenty-four oligonucleotide duplexes 22 base pairs in length were used to solve for individual nearest-neighbor activation volumes and transition volumes. Statistically, the most valid fit of the volumetric data was obtained with a six-parameter model in which the directionality of the dinucleotide steps is not considered, for example, 5'AG/CT is the same as 5'GA/TC. The resultant transition volumes at 48 degrees C ranged from -7.1 +/- 0.8 mL/mol (GC/CG) to +2.9 +/- 0.3 mL/mol (AA/TT). The success of the six-parameter model suggests that the relative size of the nearest-neighbor dinucleotides is the most important factor determining the magnitude of the volumetric parameters. The finding that the magnitude of the volumetric parameters correlates with the change in the solvent accessible surface area of the bases during the helix-coil transition corroborates this hypothesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".