Decisive situations influencing continuous positive airway pressure initiation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome – A critical incident technique analysis from the personnel’s perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Continuous positive airway pressure is an effective treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, but adherenceto treatment is low. Interventions such as encouragement, education and cognitive behavioural therapy have affected adherenceto continuous positive airway pressure treatment positively. Currently there are no studies regarding the situation for personnelduring the initiation process of treatment.Purpose: The purpose was to describe situations influencing the initiation of continuous positive airway pressure in patientswith obstructive sleep apnea syndrome from a personnel perspective.Materials and methods: A qualitative approach using critical incident technique was used. Data were collected through semistructuredinterviews. Thirty one informants were strategically selected from sixteen centres in Sweden.Results: Motivation, a prepared patient, communicational aspects and participation of family were described as pedagogicalcircumstances. External conditions, practical experience, the patient’s state of health and adaption to the mask were describedas practical circumstances. The personnel handled the situations in a theoretical, practical and/or an emotional way.Conclusions: A better understanding of situations creating barriers or being facilitators, as well as ways to handle these situations,can be used to develop the role of personnel during the initiation process in order to increase continuous positive airwaypressure adherence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".