MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117505089 · doi:10.5376/ijmvr.2013.03.0007

White Rice-like Granule Lesions in Chlamydially Aborted Fetus's Placentas: PCR Diagnosis of A Case

2013· article· en· W2117505089 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qiu Changqing

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Molecular Veterinary Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite (mutation)FetusMedicineObstetricsBiologyPathologyPregnancyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On the pig farm in Longyan City, Fujian province, chlamydial abortion in pregnant pigs happened. White rice-like granule lesions were formed in the placentas of some cases which had not been reported before in China. For knowledge of the problem, 30 pig sera were sampled for detecting the antibodies against chlamydia psittaci using IHA for animal chlamydiosis and the result of test was 12 serum samples were positive for chlamydial antibody (the antibody titer 1:16~1:64), and the chlamydia infection rate reached 12/30 (40.0%). And we sampled two fetus stomach contents and five fetal membranes for examining Chlamydia sp. by means of nested polymerase chain reaction (nested-PCR) and the result showed 1/2 aborted pig fetus’s fetal membranes with a lot of white rice-like granules, 2/2 aborted pig fetus’ stomach contents, and 2/3 aborted pig fetus’s fetal membranes without any white rice-like granules were positive for chlamydia (5/7 positive rate). The lesion formation may be related with chlamydia infection time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Molecular Veterinary ResearchSame topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207