MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117536194 · doi:10.1109/iedm.1995.497202

High resolution tri-linear colour TDI CCD image sensor with programmable responsivity gain

2002· article· en· W2117536194 on OpenAlexaff
Suhail Agwani, James J. Miller, S.G. Chamberlain, William D. Washkurak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsDalsa Corporation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResponsivityImage sensorFilter (signal processing)OpticsMaterials scienceDetectorDynamic rangeComputer scienceInterference (communication)Time delay and integrationOptical filterOptoelectronicsPhotodetectorComputer visionPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We developed a 6032 element, 32 stage Tri-linear Time Delay and Integration Focal Plane Array for high resolution colour imaging applications. The sensor offers an improvement of a factor of 10 over comparable line scan CCD sensors. The imager architecture utilizes three individual TDI arrays, with a new multi-layer dielectric interference film (DIF) color filter or a dyed polyamide patterned monolithic filter that helps achieve accurate spectral separation in the three primary colour bands centered at 450 nm, 550 nm and 650 nm respectively. We also incorporated in the sensor a new programmable responsivity mechanism. This is achieved by an on-chip imaging area size selection mechanism. The sensors operate in the time-delay-and-integration mode. Depending on the level of illumination the user is able to dynamically select the number of TDI stages per sensor. The total number of TDI gain stages can be selected in blocks of 32, 16, 8, or 4. This property provides improvement in the dynamic range of the sensor by extending the response of the CCD over a wide range of illumination levels. Depending on the light energy incident on the sensor, the user can dynamically vary the number of TDI stages used for integrating an incident scene. The result is a programmable responsivity depending on the level of incident illumination. Such technique optimizes the performance of the CCD colour sensor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207