Expression cloning of the <i>Candida albicans CSA1</i> gene encoding a mycelial surface antigen by sorting of <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> transformants with monoclonal antibody‐coated magnetic beads
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mycelial surface antigen recognized by monoclonal antibody (mAb) 4E1 has previously been shown to be present predominantly in the terminal third of the hyphal structures in Candida albicans. We report here the expression cloning of the corresponding gene (CSA1 ) by mAb 4E1-coated magnetic beads sorting of Saccharomyces cerevisiae transformants expressing a C. albicans genomic library. The strategy is both highly selective and highly sensitive and provides an additional genetic tool for the cloning and characterization of C. albicans genes encoding surface proteins. CSA1 is an intronless gene encoding a 1203-residue protein composed of repetitive motifs and domains. Northern analysis indicates that CSA1 is preferentially expressed during the mycelial growth phase, although a low level of CSA1 mRNA can be detected in the yeast form. As evidenced by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy with mAb 4E1, Csa1p is not randomly distributed over the surface of yeast cells, but localizes predominantly in the growing buds. This suggests that the distribution of Csa1p may be restricted to sites of cell surface elongation. Both heterozygous and homozygous C. albicans csa1Delta mutants are viable. Upon induction of mycelial growth, the number and size of hyphal structures derived from the mutants are similar to those observed in the parental wild-type strain. The physiological role of Csa1p has yet to be determined. However, the presence in Csa1p of repeated cysteine-rich hydrophobic domains with significant sequence similarity to motifs found in surface proteins (Ag2 and Pth11) from two distantly related fungal pathogens (Coccidioides immitis and Magnaporthe grisea respectively) suggests a common function in host interaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".