Systematic study of the fluorescence decays of amino‐coumarin dyes in polymer matrices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We measured the fluorescence decays of seven different amino‐coumarin dyes in polymer films of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), poly(styrene) (PS), and ethylene‐butene rubber (EBR); as well as in the small molecule analogs ethyl acetate and toluene. Many of the dye‐solvent and dye‐polymer combinations exhibited single exponential decays with lifetimes ranging from 2.3 to 3.9 ns. Small deviations from single exponential behavior occurred for most of the dyes in EBR. Significant deviations from single exponential behavior occurred for 7‐(diethylamino)‐2‐oxo‐2H‐1‐benzopyran‐3‐carboxylic acid (coumarin‐3) in ethyl acetate and in all polymer matrices and 2,3,6,7‐tetrahydro‐11‐oxo‐1H,5H,11H‐[1]benzopyrano[6,7,8‐ij]quinolizin‐10‐carboxylic acid (coumarin‐343) in all of the polymer matrices. Time‐resolved fluorescence spectra indicated the presence of two different excited states for coumarin‐3 and coumarin‐343 in PMMA; these spectra were qualitatively different from the time‐resolved spectra of coumarin‐3 in ethyl acetate. We rationalize these results in terms of the chemical functionalities of the various dyes. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 45: 2333–2343, 2007
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".