MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117608041 · doi:10.1128/mcb.01120-07

Acetylation-Induced Transcription Is Required for Active DNA Demethylation in Methylation-Silenced Genes

2007· article· en· W2117608041 on OpenAlexafffund
Ana C. D’Alessio, Ian C.G. Weaver, Moshe Szyf

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular and Cellular Biology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Cancer InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBiologyDNA demethylationRNA polymerase IIMolecular biologyDNA methylationEpigenetics of physical exerciseTranscription (linguistics)DemethylationPromoterHistone methylationGeneGeneticsGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hallmark of vertebrate genes is that actively transcribed genes are hypomethylated in critical regulatory sequences. However, the mechanisms that link gene transcription and DNA hypomethylation are unclear. Using a trichostatin A (TSA)-induced replication-independent demethylation assay with HEK 293 cells, we show that RNA transcription is required for DNA demethylation. Histone acetylation precedes but is not sufficient to trigger DNA demethylation. Following histone acetylation, RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) interacts with the methylated promoter. Inhibition of RNAP II transcription with actinomycin D, alpha-amanitin, or CDK7-specific small interfering RNA inhibits DNA demethylation. H3 trimethyl lysine 4 methylation, a marker of actively transcribed genes, was associated with the cytomegalovirus promoter only after demethylation. TSA-induced demethylation of the endogenous cancer testis gene GAGE follows a similar sequence of events and is dependent on RNA transcription as well. These data suggest that DNA demethylation follows rather than precedes early transcription and point towards a novel function for DNA demethylation as a memory of actively transcribed genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular and Cellular BiologySame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207