MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Patients Free of Clinical MS Activity in TEMSO and TOWER: Pooled Analyses of Two Phase 3 Placebo-Controlled Trials (P3.164)

2014· article· en· W2117630112 on OpenAlexaff
Tomas Olsson, Gıancarlo Comı, Mark Freedman, Aaron Miller, Jerry S. Wolinsky, Philippe Truffinet, Steven Cavalier, Deborah Dukovic, Paul O’Connor, Ludwig Kappos

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlaceboTowerClinical trialMedicineFreedmanPsychologyGerontologyPhysical therapyInternal medicineAlternative medicineHistoryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of teriflunomide on reducing risk of clinical multiple sclerosis (MS) activity, along with effect in pre-defined subgroups, based on pooled TEMSO (NCT00134563) and TOWER (NCT00751881) data. BACKGROUND: Teriflunomide is an oral immunomodulator approved in several countries for treatment of relapsing-remitting MS. Teriflunomide has shown consistent beneficial effects_reducing disease activity (relapse and MRI) and slowing disability progression, with a manageable safety profile across all studies. DESIGN/METHODS: A total of 2251 patients 蠅18 years with relapsing forms of MS (RMS) were randomized and treated (modified intent-to-treat population) with once-daily teriflunomide 14mg (n=728) or 7mg (n=772), or placebo (n=751) for 108 weeks (TEMSO) or 48 weeks after last patient randomized (TOWER). Primary and key secondary endpoints were annualized relapse rate (ARR) and disability progression sustained for 12 weeks. Analyses were performed according to pre-specified subgroups defined by baseline disease characteristics and prior disease-modifying therapy use. Post hoc analysis evaluated the proportion of patients free of clinical MS activity (composite of patients free of clinical relapse and disability progression sustained for 12 weeks). MRI was not performed in TOWER. RESULTS: Across treatment groups, patient demographics and baseline disease characteristics were well balanced. There was no evidence of a differential treatment effect across levels of the pre-specified subgroups for ARR or disability progression (14mg). Both teriflunomide doses significantly delayed time to clinical MS activity vs placebo (p<0.0001 and p=0.0005, for 14mg and 7mg, respectively). The proportion of patients free of clinical MS activity (Week 108) was 50.8%, 48.1%, and 40.7% for 14mg, 7mg, and placebo, respectively. Corresponding relative rate reductions (95% confidence intervals) were 29.2% (17.9%, 38.9%) for 14mg and 22.8% (11.0%, 33.1%) for 7mg versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Pooled efficacy and subgroup analyses show that teriflunomide significantly reduced risk of clinical MS activity and demonstrated consistent efficacy in a broad range of patients with RMS, confirming results of the individual studies. Study Supported by: Genzyme, a Sanofi company.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.017
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.195
GPT teacher head0.498
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology→Same topicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies→French-language works237,207→