MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117681109 · doi:10.1353/jeu.2011.0005

Ambivalent, Double, Divided: Reading and Rereading Perry Nodelman

2011· article· en· W2117681109 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Richard Flynn

Bibliographic record

VenueJeunesse Young People Texts Cultures · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt historyReading (process)ArtMedia studiesHistorySociologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ambivalent, Double, Divided: Reading and Rereading Perry Nodelman Richard Flynn (bio) Matas, Carol, and Perry Nodelman. The Curse of the Evening Eye. The Ghosthunters 2. Toronto: Key Porter, 2009. 216 pp. $11.95 pb. ISBN 978-1-55470-145-2. Print. Matas, Carol, and Perry Nodelman. The Hunt for the Haunted Elephant. The Ghosthunters 3. Toronto: Key Porter, 2010. 267 pp. $12.95 pb. ISBN 978-1-55470-265-7. Print. Matas, Carol, and Perry Nodelman. A Meeting of Minds. New York: Simon, 1999. 200 pp. $25.00 hc. ISBN 0-689-81947-1. Print. Matas, Carol, and Perry Nodelman. Of Two Minds. 1994. New York: Simon, 1995. 200 pp. No price listed hc. ISBN 0-689-80138-6. Print. Matas, Carol, and Perry Nodelman. The Proof that Ghosts Exist. The Ghosthunters 1. Toronto: Key Porter, 2008. 216 pp. $11.95 pb. ISBN 978-1-55470-014-1. Print. Nodelman, Perry. Behaving Bradley. New York: Simon, 1998. 232 pp. US$22.50 hc. ISBN 0-689-81466-6. Print. Nodelman, Perry. A Completely Different Place. New York: [End Page 137] Simon, 1997. 192 pp. US$16.00 hc. ISBN 0-689-80836-4. Print. Nodelman, Perry. The Hidden Adult: Defining Children’s Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2008. 390 pp. US$35.00 pb. ISBN 978-0-8018-8980-6. Print. Nodelman, Perry. Not a Nickel to Spare: The Great Depression Diary of Sally Cohen. Dear Canada. Toronto: Scholastic, 2007. 218 pp. $14.99 hc. ISBN 978-0-439-96130-1. Print. Nodelman, Perry. The Same Place but Different. New York: Simon, 1995. 181 pp. US$20.00 hc. ISBN 0-671-89839-6. Print. At the outset, I have to admit what might appear shameful to readers of this journal: unlike Perry Nodelman, I do not love reading children’s books. Or rather, I love some children’s books, but when I look at the stack of pleasure reading that awaits me once I have finished writing this essay and have finished the term in mid-May, there is not a single children’s book in the stack. I see several volumes of poetry, a couple of books about music, and several novels: the one I most want to read, because I think Oryx and Crake is a masterpiece, is Margaret Atwood’s The Year of the Flood. I doubt I would have read Perry Nodelman’s children’s fiction had I not been asked to write about it here. Having read it, I can report that Nodelman’s fiction clearly satisfies many of the various criteria for children’s fiction delineated in his recent book-length study The Hidden Adult, but I cannot read it without thinking constantly of the shadow text of Perry Nodelman the critic and what I know of Perry Nodelman the person. In The Hidden Adult, Perry Nodelman is scrupulous about describing his subject position: “male, short of stature and slight of build, more or less masculine, and more or less heterosexual,” of “Central European” origin, “Jewish but not religious,” “Canadian,” born in the 1940s into a culture of white male privilege (82). He does not identify himself as a writer for children except in his bio note on the back cover, or rather he does not draw explicitly on his experience as a writer for children (primarily those between the ages of eight and twelve or ten and fourteen, according to his publishers). The Hidden Adult is not children’s fiction, of course, but a work of “Literary Theory and History” (according to the book jacket) in which Nodelman unfolds an extended argument that children’s literature may be defined by its generic characteristics—that, indeed, it constitutes its own genre. It is a provocative, learned, monumental work by one of the most important and thoughtful critics in the field. It is a work I find endlessly [End Page 138] fascinating and consistently useful for my own writing and thinking about childhood and children’s literature. It is, as Beverly Lyon Clark’s jacket blurb announces, “arguably [Nodelman’s] magnum opus.” I confess that I felt somewhat intimidated when I was asked to write this review essay, as I have read The Hidden...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.016
Scholarly communication0.0100.017
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0050.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJeunesse Young People Texts CulturesSame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207