MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117692879 · doi:10.1109/t-wc.2008.070795

Multiple-symbol detection for photon-counting MIMO free-space optical communications

2008· article· en· W2117692879 on OpenAlexaff
M.L.B. Riediger, Robert Schober, Lutz Lampe

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOUpper and lower boundsComputer scienceAlgorithmChannel state informationKeyingPhase-shift keyingChannel (broadcasting)Bit error rateMathematicsTelecommunicationsDecoding methodsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We employ a photon-counting signal model of a multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) free-space optical (FSO) system and investigate detection assuming the absence of channel state information (CSI) at the receiver, in moderate to strong atmospheric turbulence. The considered modulation format is on-off keying with repetition coding across the transmitters. To partially recover the performance loss associated with symbol-by-symbol detection without CSI, we consider the application of multiple-symbol detection (MSD) to equal gain combined (EGC) statistics. We develop a fast search algorithm for EGC-MSD and propose a suboptimal closed-form decision metric suitable for reduced-complexity implementation; performance results confirm that the true and suboptimal metrics perform comparably well. Significantly, the complexity of our receiver, on a per bit-decision basis, is only logarithmically dependent on the observation window length N, and is effectively independent of the size of the MIMO array. We also present the framework for a decision-feedback receiver and obtain performance expressions for the ideal case of error-free feedback; these expressions serve as an upper bound to the performance of EGC-MSD. Analytical and simulation results indicate that the system effectively realizes the diversity gains expected from a MIMO configuration and that the performance of the EGC-MSD receiver approaches the EGC with CSI lower bound with increasing N.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207