Ring‐chain interactions in solutions of cyclic and linear poly(methylene) ester oligomers in <i>p</i>‐dioxan and chloroform
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The thermodynamic behavior of ternary solutions containing one cyclic (CYC10 and CYC20) and one linear (LIN10 and LIN20) poly(methylene) ester oligomer, respectively, in p ‐dioxan and chloroform were investigated through vapor‐pressure measurements. Experiments were carried out at 25, 30, 35, and 40 °C. The ring‐chain interaction parameters χ″ were evaluated using the Leonard's equation for a ternary polymer solution containing one ring polymer. Results indicated that the values of χ″ are concentration and solvent dependent, and they vary with molecular size and slightly with temperature. All χ″ values were positive for both CYC10/LIN10 and CYC20/LIN20 blends, with the higher values for the former system, indicating that both ring‐chain oligomer blends are nearly immiscible, and the difference between cyclic and linear oligomers decreases as molecular size increases. The positive χ″ agrees with differential scanning calorimetric measurements performed on ring‐chain oligomer blends that show two distinct endotherms for the blends. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 40: 1425–1433, 2002
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".