Individual and familial mental illness is associated with an increased risk of suicide in young people
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Agerbo E, Nordentorf M, Mortensen P. Familial, psychiatric, and socioeconomic risk factors for suicide in young people: nested case-control study. BMJ2002 July; 325 : 74 –9 [OpenUrl][1][Abstract/FREE Full Text][2] QUESTION: What family, individual and socioeconomic factors are associated with youth suicide? Case-control study using Danish population registers. All recorded youth suicides between 1981 and 1997 (496 people aged 10–21 years) were matched with 24,800 controls. Parents and siblings were identified from population based registers. Inpatient data were gathered from discharge registers of national hospitals and socioeconomic data were collected from administrative registers. Suicide data were collated from official registries. Youth mental illness was the factor most … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DBMJ%26rft.stitle%253DBMJ%26rft.aulast%253DAgerbo%26rft.auinit1%253DE.%26rft.volume%253D325%26rft.issue%253D7355%26rft.spage%253D74%26rft.epage%253D74%26rft.atitle%253DFamilial%252C%2Bpsychiatric%252C%2Band%2Bsocioeconomic%2Brisk%2Bfactors%2Bfor%2Bsuicide%2Bin%2Byoung%2Bpeople%253A%2Bnested%2Bcase-control%2Bstudy%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1136%252Fbmj.325.7355.74%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F12114236%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=bmj&resid=325/7355/74&atom=%2Febmental%2F6%2F2%2F61.atom
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".