MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117821616 · doi:10.3171/ped.2005.103.3.0282

Paraparesis caused by an angiolipomatous hamartoma in an adolescent with Proteus syndrome and scoliosis

2005· article· en· W2117821616 on OpenAlexaff
Neil J. White, D. Douglas Cochrane, Richard Beauchamp

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of neurosurgery · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineScoliosisHamartomaProteus syndromeMagnetic resonance imagingSpinal cordSpinal cord compressionSurgeryRadiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This 16-year-old boy with Proteus syndrome suffered acute spinal cord compression secondary to hemorrhage into an extradural paraspinal angiolipomatous hamartoma. A magnetic resonance (MR) imaging study performed 12 years earlier had revealed the presence of this tumor at the apex of a mild thoracic scoliosis, which had been stable during the intervening decade. Spinal cord neurological deficit in Proteus syndrome is rare. It can arise either from vertebral abnormalities and kyphoscoliotic deformities or from tumor encroachment. The authors describe the temporal evolution of scoliosis and acute spinal cord compression caused by a paraspinal angiolipomatous hamartoma over a period of 12 years. A review of the literature suggests that regular follow up, including serial MR imaging, is indicated in children with Proteus syndrome and scoliosis. Earlier resection of extradural tumor mass encroaching on the cord is warranted in the treatment of these children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of neurosurgerySame topicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma CasesFrench-language works237,207