Distorted Wave Theories Applied to Double Ionization by Ion Impact: Simulation of Higher-Order Processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the goals in studies of double ionization (DI) of simple atoms by electron or ion impact is to elucidate and assess the different mechanisms that lead to this atomic process. In this work we present an attempt to model the mechanisms beyond the first order in DI of helium by highly charged projectiles. To this end we employ the continuum distorted wave-eikonal initial state (CDW-EIS) formalism joint with a Monte Carlo event generator (MCEG). The MCEG allows us to generate theoretical event files that represent the counterpart of the data obtained from a kinematically complete experiment. Starting from these event files, a new data analysis tool used to contrast theory and experiment in DI, the four-body Dalitz plots, is easily produced. The higher order mechanisms are simulated by considering DI as a sequential process: a single ionization of a helium atom as a first step and another single ionization of a single-charged helium ion as a second step. Some of the features in the experimental data are very well reproduced by these simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".