Collagen orientation in periosteum and perichondrium is aligned with preferential directions of tissue growth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A feedback mechanism between different tissues in a growing bone is thought to determine the bone's morphogenesis. Cartilage growth strains the surrounding tissues, eliciting alterations of its matrix, which in turn, creates anisotropic stresses, guiding directionality of cartilage growth. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this hypothesis by determining whether collagen fiber directions in the perichondrium and periosteum align with the preferential directions of long bone growth. Tibiotarsi from chicken embryos across developmental stages were scanned using optical projection tomography (OPT) to assess preferential directions of growth at characteristic sites in perichondrium and periosteum. Quantified morphometric data were compared with two-photon laser-scanning microscopy images of the three-dimensional collagen network in these fibrous tissues. The diaphyseal periosteum contained longitudinally oriented collagen fibers that aligned with the preferential growth direction. Longitudinal growth at both metaphyses was twice the circumferential growth. This concurred with well-developed circumferential fibers, which covered and were partly interwoven with a dominant network of longitudinally oriented fibers in the outer layer of the perichondrium/periosteum at the metaphysis. Toward both articulations, the collagen network of the epiphyseal surface was randomly oriented, and growth was approximately biaxial. These findings support the hypothesis that the anisotropic architecture of the collagen network, detected in periosteum and perichondrium, concurs with the assessed growth directions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".