MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Influence of past and present-day plate motions on spherical models of mantle convection: implications for mantle plumes and hotspots

2006· article· en· W2117945754 on OpenAlexaff
S. Quéré, A. M. Forte

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMantle convectionGeologyPlate tectonicsMantle (geology)GeophysicsConvectionGeodynamicsBuoyancyHotspot (geology)SubductionMid-ocean ridgeTectonicsSeismologyMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We explore the influence of tectonic plate motions, given by the no-net-rotation (NNR)-NUVEL-1 model, on a 3-D spherical model of mantle convection in which plates can be coupled to the underlying mantle flow in a dynamically consistent manner. We first derived a reference convection model in which only the NUVEL-1 geometry of the tectonic plates is prescribed. The plate rotations are then predicted on the basis of the buoyancy forces in the mantle, ensuring a dynamical balance of torques acting on the plates. This dynamically consistent reference convection model, which is based on a simple two-layer viscosity profile, yields the main features of plate tectonics: linear subduction zones, passive diverging zones and four mantle plumes. We next developed a time-dependent convection model, which is initiated with the average radial temperature field extracted from the reference convection model, and in which we imposed the NNR-NUVEL-1 plate velocities. This convection simulation yields six focused upwelling plumes, whose location and number is very similar to the primary terrestrial hotspots which have been recently identified (Courtillot 2003). In all convection models incorporating the NNR-NUVEL-1 plate motions, we find that the surface heat flow and mantle potential temperature stay essentially constant, demonstrating the compatibility between the observed NNR-NUVEL-1 velocities and the internal buoyancy forces in the mantle. To determine the robustness of these results we carried out complementary convection simulations incorporating the past 120 Ma history of tectonic plate evolution. These simulations yielded shifting ‘hotlines’ at the core–mantle boundary, but the locations of the overlying hotspot plumes remained relatively stable. The configuration of the hotlines in the convection experiments with and without evolving surface plate geometries are very similar to each other, showing that convection models with present-day plate configurations are sufficient for capturing the essential characteristics of the present-day thermal structure in the mantle. In a final experiment, the prescribed NNR-NUVEL-1 plate velocity constraint is released, allowing the plates to rotate freely in response to the underlying mantle flow. We find that the initial evolution of this model is characterized by a strong stability of the mantle thermal structures, in particular the upwelling plumes. An important and novel feature of the convection model with free plate motions is the predicted opening of the African plate along the East African Rift boundary, which occurs in response to the large-scale mantle flow and does not appear to require the presence of upwelling plumes directly beneath the rift.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207